Alexandra Grose - author
Tuesday, 5 May 2026
Quickening.
Tuesday, 21 April 2026
Wisdom of God.
Saturday, 18 April 2026
The Nicolaitan Deeds.
The deeds of
the Nicolaitans in Revelation were understood by the early church as a blend of
moral compromise, idolatry, and distorted teaching that encouraged Christians
to blur the line between loyalty to Christ and participation in pagan culture.
Revelation names their works as something Jesus hates (Rev. 2:6 But this you
have, that you hate the deeds of the Nicolaitans, which I hate also) and
directly links their teaching to the pattern of Balaam, who led Israel into
idolatry and sexual immorality.
Rev. 2:14–15
But I have a few things against you, because you have there those who hold the
doctrine of Balaam, who taught Balak to put a stumbling block before the
children of Israel, to eat things sacrificed to idols, and to commit sexual
immorality. Thus you also have those who hold the doctrine of the Nicolaitans,
which thing I hate.
Core deeds
attributed to the Nicolaitans fall into two tightly connected categories:
- Idolatrous
compromise — They encouraged believers to participate in meals and rituals
connected to pagan temples, including eating food sacrificed to idols. This was
a direct violation of apostolic teaching in Acts 15:29 (that you abstain from
things offered to idols, from blood, from things strangled, and from sexual
immorality. If you keep yourselves from these, you will do well) and was seen
as spiritual infidelity.
- Sexual
immorality — Their teaching treated bodily holiness as irrelevant, promoting a
permissive lifestyle under the banner of “grace” or “spiritual freedom.” Early
writers describe them as self‑indulgence and as indulging in
sensuality.
There are several
theological distortions which seem to have shaped their behaviour. The
underlying belief system that produced these deeds are twisting grace into
permission for sin, denying that obedience mattered. Treating the body as
spiritually irrelevant, so bodily sin “didn’t count.” And a spirit of
domination — the name Nicolaitan (“to conquer the people”) may reflect a push
toward hierarchical control or elitism within the church.
Some early
fathers traced the group to Nicolas of Antioch, one of the original seven
deacons (see Acts 6:5), whose teaching was later corrupted by followers into a
justification for moral laxity.
Their
practices:
- Defiled
the purity of the church
-
Misrepresented the gospel by replacing liberty with license. Liberty being the
right and freedom of individuals protected by law. License being the permission
granted to individuals under certain conditions. Liberty is the absence of
arbitrary and illogical restrictions, whereas license implies excess freedom that
may disregard laws and social norms.
- Led
believers into stumbling, echoing Balaam’s ancient treachery – that of leading
people into sin, idolatry and sexual immorality.
- Blurred
the boundary between Christ and the surrounding culture in a way that
threatened the church’s identity and witness.
The deeper
pattern here is that the Nicolaitans weren’t just a fringe sect—they embodied a
recurring temptation in every age, today included: to baptize cultural
compromise as “grace,” and to treat holiness as optional.
When we work
with Christ we have;
- a
heightened awareness of truth vs. spin.
- we notice
where institutions or people try to hide things.
- a sharper
instinct for what’s real and what’s performative.
- a sense of
“I’m not buying that” without needing to argue, but to quietly look into the
matter and find truth for yourself.
This is the
kind of day we want. It’s the kind of day where your discernment is switched on
without effort. Continually.
Sunday, 12 April 2026
Up Front Prayer.
Holy Spirit was strong on Sunday. At the same time I felt Holy Spirit enter the room, many people all at once started peeling of jumpers. Pastor even mentioned to the worship team that it was Holy Spirit heat.
With such a strong presence in the room, I expected people to flock to the front for prayer. I even hung back a few minutes in case called upon to aid in prayer. One person came forward. And I’m guilty of not coming forward. I pray for myself at home and only on occasion will the issue feel so great that I’ll call upon the prayer team.
Pondering upon the lack of openness to move to the front, even with the Holy Spirit present, I came home and looked into how we can move people to the front for prayer. This is what I got…
Most people don’t come forward for prayer not because they don’t want prayer, but because the format feels exposing, risky, or unclear. The desire is there—what’s missing is a sense of safety and normalcy.
I don’t think Pastor could have done more in the way of encouragement. Most of what’s covered below, Pastor spoke of when calling people to the front and yet only one person came forward. However, upon further reflection, a couple of things cropped up that might be worth considering.
First - Why people hesitate;
Before offering solutions, it helps to name the quiet barriers people rarely say out loud:
- Fear of being watched — “Everyone will see me go up.”
- Uncertainty — “Is this for big problems only?”
- Shame — “People will think something is wrong with me.”
- Lack of clarity — “What actually happens when I go up?”
- Emotional vulnerability — “I don’t want to cry in front of people.”
Then - Once a church understands these invisible dynamics, it can reshape the environment to feel safe, normal, and invitational.
Ways to encourage more people to come forward for prayer;
1. Normalize prayer ministry by widening the invitation.
Instead of “If you need prayer, come forward,” try:
- “If you want more of God’s presence this week…”
- “If you’re carrying anything—big or small…”
- “If you simply want blessing for the week ahead…”
This shifts prayer from crisis‑only to everyday discipleship.
2. Have leaders model it.
When pastors or elders occasionally go forward for prayer themselves, it signals:
- “This is for everyone.”
- “Needing prayer is normal.”
- “Leaders aren’t above receiving.”
Culture changes when vulnerability is modelled from the front.
3. Create multiple prayer spaces.
Not everyone wants to stand at the front. Options help:
- A side‑room with soft lighting.
- Prayer stations around the room.
- Quiet corners with trained intercessors.
People are far more likely to step into prayer when it doesn’t feel like a spotlight moment.
4. Explain what will happen - A simple 20‑second explanation removes anxiety:
- “Someone will gently ask your name.”
- “They’ll ask how they can pray.”
- “They’ll pray briefly and respectfully.”
Clarity dissolves fear.
5. Use gentle, invitational language.
Instead of “Come now,” try:
- “We’d love to pray with you.”
- “You’re welcome to come at any point during the song.”
- “There’s no pressure—just an open invitation.”
People respond to warmth, not pressure.
6. Integrate prayer into worship moments. For example:
- During a reflective song, invite people to move.
- Directly after worship or communion, offer prayer stations.
- During a testimony, invite those with similar needs to receive prayer.
Movement feels more natural when the room is already active.
7. Celebrate answered prayer - Without being sensational, share stories:
- “Last week someone received prayer for anxiety and felt peace.”
- “Someone came forward for healing and sensed God’s presence.”
Testimony builds expectation.
8. Train prayer ministers to be gentle, safe, and Spirit‑led. This church already has this kind of team. Reinforcement over the gentle, safe and Spirit-led, might open hearts.
When people know the team is trustworthy—no awkwardness, no over‑praying, no intensity—they relax. A safe culture draws people like water draws roots.
People come forward when the environment feels like a womb, not a stage - when it’s a place of covering, not exposure, a place of encounter, not performance. When a church shifts from “altar call” to “sacred space,” people move.
Hopefully your church can implement some of these ideas and prayer can become normal, perhaps looked forward to and even zealous in the house of God.
Saturday, 11 April 2026
Passover Lamb Entrails.
Were the Passover lamb’s entrails wrapped around the lamb’s head? The short answer is yes — there is an ancient Jewish source that explicitly says the Passover lamb’s entrails were wrapped around its head during roasting, but this detail is not found in the book of Exodus itself. It comes from later Jewish tradition describing how the command was carried out.
The description comes from the Mishnah, specifically Mishnah Pesachim 7:1, which outlines how the Passover lamb (korban pesach) was prepared in Second Temple Judaism.
The Mishnah states that the lamb was roasted whole with its entrails placed inside the body, because the Torah required it to be roasted “whole” and “not boiled” (Exodus 12:9). This method allowed the animal to remain intact while still removing and cleaning the organs. This is the earliest and most authoritative source for the practice in that era.
The Mishnah passage was written in the late 2nd to early 3rd century CE, because that’s when the entire Mishnah was redacted and fixed in written form. Mishnah Pesachim 7:1 is part of the Mishnah’s final redaction (gathering, shaping and finalizing existing oral or written work), completed around 200-220 CE. Although not written in the Mishnah itself the details appear in the Tosefta which date to that same period and was written just after the Mishnah, as a parallel and supplementary reflection.
To further clarify; Mishnah was redacted in 200-220 CE. Tosefta (where the ‘entrails on the head’ line actually appears) was compiled slightly later and likely was during the late 3rd century CE.
Exodus 12 gives these instructions:
- Roast the lamb whole.
- Do not break any of its bones.
- Do not boil it.
- Eat it in haste.
But Exodus does not describe the internal preparation of the lamb. The Mishnah fills in the cultural and ritual details that Jews of the Second Temple period understood as the correct way to obey the command. The Tosefta picks it up from there.
Why the entrails were wrapped around the head…
According to rabbinic interpretation: The lamb had to be roasted whole, as a single unit. The entrails had to be cleaned, but could not be removed in a way that made the lamb “not whole.” Wrapping the entrails around the head (or placing them inside the body cavity) preserved the symbolic wholeness.
This also visually resembled a person on a spit, which the rabbis noted was a deliberate contrast to pagan sacrificial practices.
Primary source you can check - Mishnah Pesachim 7:1
This is the earliest written record of the practice and is accepted by historians as describing how Passover lambs were prepared in the late Second Temple period. “They cut it open, remove its entrails, and place them in a bowl and burn them on the altar.” The Mishnah does not describe wrapping the entrails around the head; that detail appears in later rabbinic interpretations (Tosefta Pesachim 3:11 and some medieval commentaries), not in the Mishnah itself.
Tosefta Pesachim 3:11 is part of the public‑domain tannaitic corpus, so I can quote it in full.
Tosefta Pesachim 3:11 — full text (standard scholarly translation):
How do they roast the Passover offering?
They bring a spit of pomegranate wood and insert it through its mouth to its buttocks. They place its entrails upon its head, because it is said: ‘its head with its legs and with its entrails’ (Exodus 12:9). They do not roast it on a metal grate, nor in an oven, nor in a pot, but only over fire.”
Notes that help frame the passage:
This is the earliest explicit rabbinic source that describes the entrails being placed on (or “wrapped around”) the head during roasting.
The Mishnah (Pesachim 7:1) does not include this detail; it appears only in the Tosefta. The wording is based on a literal reading of Exodus 12:9, which commands roasting the lamb “its head with its legs and with its entrails.”
The exact wording from the Tosefta reads where the “wrapped around the head” detail actually appears. The line you’re looking for appears in Tosefta Pesachim 3:11, and the wording is very compact. The standard critical editions (Lieberman; Zuckermandel) agree on the essential phrasing: “…and they roast it whole as one piece, and its entrails they place upon its head.”
The Tosefta assumes the entrails have already been cleaned. The Mishnah requires them to be removed and burned on the altar when dealing with the Temple offering. The Tosefta’s instruction concerns the domestic Passover roasting once the Temple was destroyed.
The question over the lamb's entrails was raised in relation to a talk given at church, which in turn was on the topic of Passover and the similarities between the Exodus Passover and the Passover in Jesus' time. It seems, while no way to definitively prove this action was done during the exodus from Egypt, yes, at some point in history, they did wrap the entrails around the lamb's head. Quite possibly a later addition to the way the sacrifice was initially done.
Thursday, 9 April 2026
A Deeper Dive into the Menorah.
At its core, a menorah is the scriptural symbol of God’s light, presence, wisdom, and creative order. The Hebrew itself already hints at this: menorah comes from the root word meaning light, to shine, or to give light.
The menorah in scripture is the seven‑branched golden lampstand placed in the Tabernacle and later the Temple. God gives Moses extremely detailed instructions for its construction in Exodus 25:31–40, emphasizing that it must be made of one piece of pure gold, with almond‑shaped cups, buds, and blossoms. This unity of design is itself symbolic depicting one piece, one light, one source.
The menorah is viewed as a symbol of divine presence. Across scripture light equals God’s presence, guidance, and truth. The menorah’s continual flame in the Holy Place represented: God dwelling among His people. God illuminating the path of righteousness. God’s wisdom shining in darkness. Its perpetual burning was commanded in Exodus 27:20–21, showing that God’s presence is not intermittent but enduring.
The seven branches represent completeness and creation. The number seven in scripture signals wholeness, fullness, and divine perfection. Many scholars and Jewish traditions see the menorah as a symbol of: The seven days of creation. The fullness of God’s wisdom. The complete cycle of divine order. The menorah becomes a visual theology: creation illuminated by the Creator.
Almond blossoms signify; life, awakening, and watchfulness. The almond tree is the first to bloom in Israel symbolizing: New life. Spiritual awakening. God’s readiness to perform His word (Jeremiah 1:11–12). The menorah’s almond‑shaped cups therefore speak of the word bringing life and emerging from divine light.
The menorah is also considered a symbol of the Spirit. In Zechariah 4, the prophet sees a golden lampstand fed by two olive trees. The olive trees represent the two anointed ones who stand beside the Lord of the whole earth (Christ and Holy Spirit). God interprets the vision to the prophet: “Not by might, nor by power, but by My Spirit.” This ties the menorah directly to the empowering presence of Christ and Holy Spirit—the true source of illumination and strength – and that works today, through Christ and the Holy Spirit as well as His ministers and servants (that’s you and me).
The menorah is a symbol of identity and calling. Historically and spiritually, the menorah became a symbol of: Israel’s vocation to be a light to the nations and by extension, us. The covenant relationship between God and His people, for it won’t come together without that relationship. And the resilience of faith through darkness. It is not merely an object but a calling.
The psychological and spiritual dimension, for your journey today, is that through our interest in agency (self-governing), symbolism, and discernment, the menorah speaks profoundly:
- It is a place of light—meaning your life becomes a vessel where divine illumination flows.
- It is one piece of gold—your calling is unified, not fragmented.
- It is continually burning—agency is sustained not by striving but by divine presence.
- It is almond‑blossomed—your growth is awakened by light, not pressure.
- It is Spirit‑fed—your effectiveness comes from alignment, not effort.
The menorah becomes a picture of what it means to carry God’s presence as a steady, life‑giving flame.